Contents Menu Expand Light mode Dark mode Auto light/dark, in light mode Auto light/dark, in dark mode Skip to content
INTEGRATE 0.99.9 documentation
INTEGRATE 0.99.9 documentation
  • Installation
  • Getting started
  • Data format
  • Borehole Data Format
  • Query Tool
  • Prior Data Generation
  • Rejection Sampling
  • Workflows
  • Example Gallery
    • Getting Started
      • Getting started with INTEGRATE
      • Compare EM forward models
      • Getting started with INTEGRATE - with no forward code
      • Getting started with INTEGRATE - posterior analysis only
    • The Complete Workflow
      • The complete INTEGRATE workflow: from data to posterior
    • Data
      • Borehole data in INTEGRATE – representation and integration
      • Dual data types (low and high moment seperately)
    • Noise
      • Synthetic Case Study example with different noise models (uncorrelated/correlated)
    • Hypothesis Testing
      • Daugaard Case Study with three lithology-resistivity prior models.
      • Daugaard Case Study with geology-resistivity-category prior models.
    • Querying the Posterior
      • query: Posterior Query Tool
    • Synthetic Case
      • INTEGRATE Synthetic Case Study example
    • Plotting
      • Profile Visualization in INTEGRATE
    • Raw Material Assessment
      • Daugaard: probabilistic raw-material assessment with INTEGRATE
      • Sdr. Felding: probabilistic raw-material assessment with INTEGRATE
    • Other Examples
      • INTEGRATE on ESBJERG data
      • Data, and noise, in linear or log space
      • Merging multiple data files from the same survey (ESBJERG)
      • INTEGRATE - Demonstration of merge_prior() function
      • INTEGRATE -Generic Prior Model Generation Examples
      • INTEGRATE Timing Analysis Example
  • Contributions
  • References
  • Modules (documentation)
    • integrate
    • integrate_rejection
    • integrate_io
    • integrate_plot
    • integrate_borehole
    • integrate_query
Back to top

Hypothesis Testing¶

Competing geological scenarios can be encoded as separate priors and compared against the same data, so that the data decide which scenario is supported.

Daugaard Case Study with three lithology-resistivity prior models.

Daugaard Case Study with three lithology-resistivity prior models.

Daugaard Case Study with geology-resistivity-category prior models.

Daugaard Case Study with geology-resistivity-category prior models.
Next
Daugaard Case Study with three lithology-resistivity prior models.
Previous
Synthetic Case Study example with different noise models (uncorrelated/correlated)
Copyright © 2023,2024,2025 INTEGRATE WORKING GROUP
Made with Sphinx and @pradyunsg's Furo